None
How many more prime ministers is David Miliband destined to be rumoured to succeed?
Hard to remember, but two years ago, David Miliband was being spoken of as a successor to Tony Blair. And only six months ago, he thought he might take on Gordon Brown. You can only become leader of the Labour Party with union support. And that, as the Daily Mail made graphically clear, doesn't exist. Not for David Miliband: 'We would be better off with Cameron': Union chief brands Miliband a 'smug and arrogant s***' We live in a profane age but, even so, it is rare for a newspaper headline like that to be published. Rarer still for the same man to be the subject of two such headlines, and with only five days between them: 'Who the f*** are you to lecture me?': Russian minister's extraordinary rant at David Miliband It seems that Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, was no more impressed with David Miliband than Derek Simpson, joint head of one of the UK's biggest unions, Unite. A Whitehall source said: 'It was effing this and effing that ... It was not what you would call diplomatic language. It was rather shocking.' Even more shocking when you realise that the man who provokes these responses is the UK's Foreign Secretary, with responsibility for the Diplomatic Service. Mr Miliband was 'surprised' by the ferocity of the verbal attack and the nature of the language, an insider close to the Foreign Secretary added. He may be surprised, but we aren't. Not any more. These Foreign Secretaries get about a bit and his latest trip was to India: Why did he think it was tactful or clever to deliver a speech declaring there was no such thing "as the war on terror" in the Taj Hotel in Mumbai where dozens of innocent people were killed in a hail of machine gun bullets by terrorists? Lashkar-e-Taiba, the group linked with the murderous attack, welcomed our Foreign Secretary's "positive comments!" ... He also caused outrage with a simplistic approach to the Kashmir crisis which triggered outraged accusations in India of meddling and appeasement ... He also caused grave offence by addressing his host, Pranab Mukherjee, 73, by his first name even though the veteran foreign minister called Miliband "Your Excellency". The Indian Prime Minister is reputed to have written a letter of complaint to Gordon Brown about David Miliband's behaviour. If he did, it is unprecedented in international diplomacy. Since the India trip, Irwin Stelzer has effectively written a letter of complaint on behalf of the US: There is a rather significant impediment at the Foreign Office – the Foreign Secretary. Americans who have dealt with David Miliband confirm what many British journalists have long known. The Foreign Secretary is arrogant, given to lecturing veteran American diplomats on policies and regions of which he has only the most superficial knowledge. According to his own estimation, David Miliband is "in tune with the 'I can' generation". That may be, but his facility for upsetting people* threatens his own party. Major donors to the Labour Party don't get peerages any more and that leaves the party financially dependent on the unions, for David Miliband's success with which, please see above. Perhaps he meant it when he said in 2007: we need to fight the instinct of bureaucracies and political parties to hold on to power This leadership bid of his, aimed at the kamikaze wing of the Labour Party, would be all very well if they were the only people affected. But of course they're not. David Miliband threatens our international relations. Even-handedly, it must be admitted, with no favour shown to old friends. And no dogma. He doesn't like dogma: Labour’s success has been built on the Blair/Brown mantra that 'what counts is what works' ... from independence of the Bank of England to ASBOs to nuclear power, Labour ditched dogma and embraced common sense. So out goes the carefully developed British stance on Tibet: Last month ... Gordon Brown, the British prime minister, asked China to give money to the International Monetary Fund, in return for which Beijing would expect an increase in its voting share. Out goes the British stance on torture:
And in comes the duplicitous manipulation of the British courts, getting them to suppress evidence by pretending that a letter solicited from the US had actually been received as a surprise, a threat from out of the blue:
March 2009: the police are now investigating allegations of UK collusion in torture, 'We did things differently in my day, Mr Miliband'. * a facility which remains undiminished, 'Miliband in stand-up row with Sri Lanka defence minister over civilian deaths'. May 2009: David Miliband's piccolo diplomacy June 2009: Tortuous evasions on torture, Breaking the rules on torture July 2009: Revealed – the secret torture evidence MI5 tried to suppress, David Davis MP accuses MI5 of 'outsourcing torture', Binyam Mohamed: police to investigate claims British agents colluded in torture
|